I am moving to Czech so busy! Maybe I don't update this blog until my settledown there on mid May.

I am forty. Already. And, I am growing up! Not physically but intellectually. I feel so. But, this does not mean I am growing by myself. I am growing by the guide of my academic mentor, here in Hong Kong. This is a great finding. I have something left for growing! I am happy to find this. Thank you, HFL.

I happened to find not writing for almost four weeks. I have been absorbed in research these days. This May, I move to Europe and in August I first embargo on the UK. I've never been there. It is exciting to visit friends supporting me so much there in Europe and the UK. I will visit many universities and institutes. I welcome your invitation to come there and give talks. Thank you all! My research proceeds ahead in Hong Kong with my friend here. Hope getting together there with a bunch of new topics.

I really thank all my friends helping and support me to enhance research in EU and the UK. I've got invitations from Brunel, Westminster, Birmingham, Oxford, Salford and Portsmouth, already. I welcome more offers to allow me to enjoy talks there from the mid August to the late September in UK. I'm also excited to get in touch with you in the Continent from the mid May to the Mid August; I stay in Czech Republic. Hope get together and go forward on mutual exchange of ideas on something innovative and original!

The mid May, I move to Czech for talking as visiting professor at VSB Technological University of Ostrava. That is the region once upon a time known as Bohemia Kingdom. This is cool to label me so, right! I finally become a Bohemian, still better than Der fliegende Holländer. I stay there for three months and travel a lot around the EU countries, and embargo on the UK, finally. I've never been there; so excited! I have a chance to visit Oxford and give a talk in the Dept. of Computer Science.

I thank Lord who may allow me to live in academia, really. Today, I have got many offers of interests in my visiting and giving a talk in UK this summer. Many friends and mentors to me extend their hands to help and support me. When I was in twenties and early thirties, I've never ever imagined I would be able to travel around the world and enjoy discussions with those people working in the front of computer science. I was a late comer there. I was already twenty eight when the grad school allowed me to the M.S. program. It was a nightmare to be laughed at in classes full of the very much younger. Some of them were so nasty and annoying me. But now all of people around me are very helpful and eager to support me in sharing their doing in computer science to each other. I'm really happy to thank God and appreciate them to accept me as a buddy.

I decided to apply my Lazy Ant-like Congestion Control to automobile transportation. This is a good application of the algorithm that is powerfule to control the congestion by not the number of agents but another element in several control parameters. I'm excited to write a paper on this topic.

Good conferences and bad conferences are a topic over lunch this noon. What is good or bad in conferences? That is the question. Sounds like Hamlet. Good reputation? Good record of publication in journals? Presentations of high quality? What is the quality in presentations? I have a simple belief on this issue: you can find somebody whom you would like to keep in touch with always in good conferences. Even if they are small conferences or not so appreciated in the community, somebody you would like to see again is the key to go with the place. Too naive? Too simple? I don't think so. I finished my undergrad at an institute believed as the best in my country. But, I hate to return there although I got top 5% or better score in my record. At Chicago, it was an Illynois' Spartan university that is hard to survive a pile of assignments. I really would go back to the time, because I found friends for my life. I got my PhD at the second-best-line school, but I still go with a supervisor of the thesis, because I really appreciate his comments and supports. Conferences are same with this kind of my feelings on schools. I get together in IEEE SMC since 2010, because I enjoy to be with friends around me there. The Conference has own history. For some times the quality might have been discussed, but after re-birth or back to the origin it revived with new comers. That is the life cycle of orgamization. Conferences are not the exception. If you have somebody to get together there, it is the place to be there. Don't you think so?

I am working in the congestion problem since coming here to Hong Kong. Tonight, I have made a break-through with a solution. I would simulate over smart phone apps, maybe emulators on a stand-alone system. That is a good kick-off anyhow.

As commented in the previous writing, I have got a response to my inquiry on the rejected paper from the States. The PC chair kindly extended his analysis on our paper; the concern of their conference doesn't fit in the core topic of our manuscript. When I once got an email inquiry from a contributor to my edited book about the reason of rejection, we talked on for two to three days by email. Finally, the person understood the basis of my judgment with the word, "Thank you". I was very happy to do that. Again, I'm very happy to find others sharing the same feeling. Thank God. Praise Lord.

This topic is not good to label Research from the point of material science, but I definitely believe any research must be conducted under the Rule of Lord. Almost one year and a half ago, I experienced a very abnormal event in my own house in the morning. After that event and its developing with some evidences around me, I really believe in the world after life or eternal life. Actually, I believe in God and I trust the Bible, and I experienced a miracle in myself in Jerusalem already when I was nineteen years old. Since that time, I believe the existence beyond self in the world. But that was a first time I experienced the existence of an evidence to show eternal life. I hope more people working in the area of science pay attention at the voice beyond self when they study in their works. By doing so, people appreciate and judge what others do with right perceptions. I really think so.

I have got a notice of rejection from an IEEE symposium to a paper I submitted last December. Its notice email was sent to me two days to the prospective date of notification. Does this mean the paper was so depreciated among them? No scores, two of three reviewers wrote almost same things in different expression. Hmmm ... I emailed to the pc chair and asked him for the reason of rejection. No reply. A third reviewer says, "The is no good ... ... to accept this paper. It is difficult to read". Hey! Your own review is difficult to read. I've never got this kind of heck review in my life from IEEE crowned conferences. Maybe, it was a bad place to write papers.

Also, one of conferences sent me a letter of acceptance last week even after I dropped my submission from their system for review before the process began. I emailed them to point it out, and they apologized their confusion. But, this week, again they sent me an email of camera ready instructions. What's going in the States? Both conferences are supported by IEEE or NSF and their venues are very well-known universities, actually within top ten schools. Jesus! You guys must behave well as trusted in the world. Otherwise, people go out of the States to pursue academic career.

These happenings let me appreciate that I am here in Hong Kong; Europe is in snow and strikes and US is in intellectual turmoil. Where else can I go to research? Oh, I really thank God for his mercy on me.

I have got an approval of our proposal of special session in the coming IEEE SMC 2012 in Seoul, Korea. This is earlier than I expected their clearance of requirements on it. I am excited to organize this new direction for the IJOCI community.

I wander my bio-inspired algorithm might work well to manage wireless congestion after release of smart phones around the world. That Lazy Ant Congestion Control has a nice suggestion to the issue.

I am back from Mumbai yesterday. It was again nice to visit India. I really enjoyed talks with brilliant students there and talented researchers in India. Food was also nice. Tea is marvelous. The Staff in the lounge of Grand Hyatt in Santacruz are really knowledgeable and helpful to me. Whenever I go to that country, my research proceeds forward. I have no idea on its reason, but it is a great experience that I feel always after my visit there. When people ask me, "Do you love India?", I just say, "I don't love very much India or I don't feel bad to be here very much. Just, I like it." The proper answer should be "India may love me so much. Then, I can come to visit here quite often." Maybe, the Spirit of Wisdom represented by a Goddess of the River might love me so much.

Am working on a game-theory approach that Prof. Leung Ho-fung developed, currenly. One of its applications could be cloud-node tracking at first in my guessing; still in the mist. Actually, the problem of resource allocation is not hot in cloud computing that is easy to forward overloaded requests to sparse resources that can accept more tasks: When your servers work at noon with heavy tasks, you have other servers working on the other side of the Earth manage them, where it is midnight. Jesus, we are losing problems to tackle as technology goes on fast. But, still we have new issues in this area... What is that? Anyway, I have found another problem to think about with this game approach in ecoinformatics. This looks good to me, somehow.